Important Info:
love WAY
came after a lengthy telephone conversation with our management state the following statement, which the city has met yesterday in the context of viewing the property and the Wall:
If a gateway to public sidewalk toward established obligation, so the whole way to the sweeping and winter maintenance on the whole of sine length, adjacent to the PATH property (special and common property), so completely, because we are seen as common ownership of the entire property.
I have researched the legal requirement of the city of Mannheim and this is:
Who is responsible for the winter, when several properties in common access or access to a road?
have several properties in common access or access to a road or are they in a row at the same street, so must both ensure that the walkway is cleared in the case of ice and snow and sprinkled.
• Who needs space and scatter when two sites are separated by a walkway? If
inhabited both sides of land, so are both parties promise to evacuate in case of ice and snow and disperse. The obligation extends in each case until the middle of the walkway.
That is exactly as long as we do not have access (door or stairs) to the sidewalk and a fence as a boundary, the path is not responsible for the unexploded device, nor for any damages that may result therefrom.
BUT: The Administrator advises us to provide a goal for the time being, he will contact the city, and to speak of a release from that duty.
That is: where additions were made to the way (stairs at Thome) should stop the fence, because it implies denying access and thus takes us from the obligation.
We hope for an early statement of the manager and the city, whether we can be taken in this area from the requirement ..
Regards,
0 comments:
Post a Comment